Redisplay Messages: Compact | Brief | All | Full Show Messages: All | Without Replies Author: | Singidunum | Posted: | May 31, 2024 20:05 | Subject: | Re: 4595 Brick Modified 1 x 2 x 2/3 | Viewed: | 23 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Yesterday those additional images were not visible. Now they are there.
Either some admin has added/returned those images, or there was some bug in the
catalog.
|
|
Author: | NORILYN.BERLIN | Posted: | May 31, 2024 16:15 | Subject: | Re: SW0380 HEAD ? Set 9491 | Viewed: | 31 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, starbeanie writes:
| Certainly,
* | | 3626cpb0314 Minifigure, Head Black Thick Eyebrows, Large Reddish Brown Eyes, Nougat Cheek Lines and Chin, Furrowed Brow Pattern - Hollow Stud Parts: Minifigure, Head | Years Released: 2010 - 2014
* | | 3626bpb0314 Minifigure, Head Black Thick Eyebrows, Large Reddish Brown Eyes, Nougat Cheek Lines and Chin, Furrowed Brow Pattern - Blocked Open Stud Parts: Minifigure, Head | Years Released: 2008 - 2014
There are several sets that have those as alternates.
In Catalog, NORILYN.BERLIN writes:
| Have already 3 used sets #9491, all troopers #sw0380 have head with HOLLOW STUD.
Is that possible? We got these sets in year 2017 and stored over the time, found-out
today while checked...?!
|
|
Thank you for info!
|
|
Author: | randyf | Posted: | May 31, 2024 04:22 | Subject: | Re: 8284-2 | Viewed: | 28 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Stellar writes:
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| In Catalog, Psmith writes:
| In my opinion this item should be renamed to 8284-1 as the current Dune Buggy
8284-1 is a B-model of the Tractor 8284-1. This in line with the neighbouring
nrs.
|
Did you read the note about the different way it was marketed? The tractor is
the B model of the Dune Buggy in North America.
It is an interesting case where two different versions of the same set end up
in different categories.
|
Would be nice to have the note on both entries.
|
There you go.
|
|
Author: | Stellar | Posted: | May 31, 2024 03:31 | Subject: | Re: 8284-2 | Viewed: | 27 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, yorbrick writes:
| In Catalog, Psmith writes:
| In my opinion this item should be renamed to 8284-1 as the current Dune Buggy
8284-1 is a B-model of the Tractor 8284-1. This in line with the neighbouring
nrs.
|
Did you read the note about the different way it was marketed? The tractor is
the B model of the Dune Buggy in North America.
It is an interesting case where two different versions of the same set end up
in different categories.
|
Would be nice to have the note on both entries.
|
|
Author: | SezaR | Posted: | May 30, 2024 21:38 | Subject: | Semi-MISB Basic set 599 | Viewed: | 83 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| I bought a bunch of sealed bags and opened bags and spare parts belonging to
the set
I would say 90% complete.
What I can tell is that this inventory is so wrong!
It is nearly impossible to count parts inside sealed bags. Shall I open them
and then take photos?
My plan is to part out this set anyway.
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 30, 2024 18:58 | Subject: | Re: 4595 Brick Modified 1 x 2 x 2/3 | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, Singidunum writes:
| Part No. 4595
Brick, Modified 1 x 2 x 2/3 with Studs on Sides and Extended Stud Receptacle
--------------------------
In "Additional Notes" field please delete these words "as shown in
the additional large catalog image", because there is no additional large
catalog image anymore.
|
|
|
Author: | Singidunum | Posted: | May 30, 2024 18:21 | Subject: | 4595 Brick Modified 1 x 2 x 2/3 | Viewed: | 63 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Part No. 4595
Brick, Modified 1 x 2 x 2/3 with Studs on Sides and Extended Stud Receptacle
--------------------------
In "Additional Notes" field please delete these words "as shown in
the additional large catalog image", because there is no additional large
catalog image anymore.
|
Author: | yorbrick | Posted: | May 30, 2024 09:55 | Subject: | Re: 8284-2 | Viewed: | 29 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Psmith writes:
| In my opinion this item should be renamed to 8284-1 as the current Dune Buggy
8284-1 is a B-model of the Tractor 8284-1. This in line with the neighbouring
nrs.
|
Did you read the note about the different way it was marketed? The tractor is
the B model of the Dune Buggy in North America.
It is an interesting case where two different versions of the same set end up
in different categories.
|
Author: | Psmith | Posted: | May 30, 2024 09:31 | Subject: | 8284-2 | Viewed: | 55 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| In my opinion this item should be renamed to 8284-1 as the current Dune Buggy
8284-1 is a B-model of the Tractor 8284-1. This in line with the neighbouring
nrs.
|
|
Author: | starbeanie | Posted: | May 30, 2024 08:08 | Subject: | Re: SW0380 HEAD ? Set 9491 | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| Certainly,
* | | 3626cpb0314 Minifigure, Head Black Thick Eyebrows, Large Reddish Brown Eyes, Nougat Cheek Lines and Chin, Furrowed Brow Pattern - Hollow Stud Parts: Minifigure, Head | Years Released: 2010 - 2014
* | | 3626bpb0314 Minifigure, Head Black Thick Eyebrows, Large Reddish Brown Eyes, Nougat Cheek Lines and Chin, Furrowed Brow Pattern - Blocked Open Stud Parts: Minifigure, Head | Years Released: 2008 - 2014
There are several sets that have those as alternates.
In Catalog, NORILYN.BERLIN writes:
| Have already 3 used sets #9491, all troopers #sw0380 have head with HOLLOW STUD.
Is that possible? We got these sets in year 2017 and stored over the time, found-out
today while checked...?!
|
|
|
Author: | NORILYN.BERLIN | Posted: | May 30, 2024 07:55 | Subject: | SW0380 HEAD ? Set 9491 | Viewed: | 47 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Have already 3 used sets #9491, all troopers #sw0380 have head with HOLLOW STUD.
Is that possible? We got these sets in year 2017 and stored over the time, found-out
today while checked...?!
|
Author: | 1001bricks | Posted: | May 29, 2024 15:18 | Subject: | Re: Who can clarify details for 371-3 (Plane)? | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, askdrhook writes:
| I‘m not much interested in a wide discussion. Only responses that help clarification
are highly welcome.
|
Ah? OK sorry, I won't say anything then.
|
Author: | Nubs_Select | Posted: | May 29, 2024 14:31 | Subject: | Re: Who can clarify details for 371-3 (Plane)? | Viewed: | 40 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, askdrhook writes:
| The coastguard plane 371-3 from 1977 has a large number of inverted slopes 2
x 2. They exist in two shapes: a) with round inner pin, b) with rectangled inner
pin. Who knows wich were in the original set?
|
the set's inventory says that
is used not
|
|
Author: | askdrhook | Posted: | May 29, 2024 14:25 | Subject: | Who can clarify details for 371-3 (Plane)? | Viewed: | 79 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| The coastguard plane 371-3 from 1977 has a large number of inverted slopes 2
x 2. They exist in two shapes: a) with round inner pin, b) with rectangled inner
pin. Who knows wich were in the original set?
Moreover I‘m interested where the mould entries were on all standard parts. In
1977 no bricks with thin walls were used, far as I know.
I‘m not much interested in a wide discussion. Only responses that help clarification
are highly welcome.
|
|
|
Author: | askdrhook | Posted: | May 29, 2024 06:13 | Subject: | Re: 2x2 Brick - which is correct? | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, maxx3001 writes:
| These extra listings were only made to make it easier for old set restorers to
find the right parts.
|
I'm one of these restorers and I don't mind, if there is some generic
part listing in the inventory first. But I want an opportunity to drill down
for each part, which variants are known. At least I want to have some estimated
time frame from when til when certain variants were common.
A linked discussion per set, in which proven part variants may be shown, would
be the perfect solution, because it may shed some light if varying part combinations
really existed in original packages (which I dare to doubt even in long production
periods).
So there should definitely be a way for lovers of deeper insight to find such
info on BrickLink - where else?
|
|
Author: | ha2772a | Posted: | May 28, 2024 19:41 | Subject: | Adventurer Minifgure Names | Viewed: | 48 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| The Adventurer minifigures had multiple English names during the various subthemes
but not all are present in the catalog or are inconsistently named. The figure
"Gail Storm / Pippin Reed" have double names on each version of the character
already. Can the other multi-named figures be similarly renamed? This is very
needed as some figures are of the same character but have different names but
do not have both names.
Here are my suggestions for consistency. The first name is the widest used name,
and I've tried to include all North American, UK, and international English
versions. All of these are sourced from Birckipedia
adv006, adv026, adv033, adv035, and adv040 should be renamed "Dr. Kilroy
/ Dr. Charles Lightning"
adv003, adv004, adv005, adv039, adv025, and adv036 should be renamed "Baron
von Barron / Lord Sam Sinister / Sam Sanister". The Sanister/Sinister spelling
discrepancy was a division between North America and international English media
during the Dino subtheme later corrected for Orient Expedition.
adv038 should be renamed "Slyboots / Sam Sinister". As the Brickipedia
article explains, this character was originally named Sam Sinister in North America
and appeared alongside Baron Von Barron but was dropped in subsequent subthemes
and Baron von Barron was renamed Lord Sam Sinister. The Slyboots name is the
original Dutch name and provides clarity on the confusion.
adv002 should be renamed "Alexis Sinister / Alexis Sanister". Same spelling
discrepancy as "Baron Von Barron / Lord Sam Sinister / Sam Sanister"
adv014 should be renamed "Rudo Villano / Max Villano"
adv023 and adv043 should be renamed "Señor Palomar / Señor Gomez"
adv021 should be renamed "Pharaoh Hotep / Pharaoh Ramses"
Additionally, it doesn't seem like adv053a/adv053b belongs to Adventurers.
It was released in an educational set nearly a decade after the final orient
expedition set and doesn't seem to have any official relation to Adventurers,
especially considering the torso is a Kingdoms print.
|
|
Author: | CanadaFirst | Posted: | May 27, 2024 11:11 | Subject: | Re: Made a mistake when submitting a request | Viewed: | 38 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, Turez writes:
| In Catalog Requests, CanadaFirst writes:
| Title says it all, I made a mistake and sent a request for change in weight and
size for the wrong set.
I meant to add the info to set 6469-1 but sent it for 6461-1
How do I cancel my request for 6461-1?
|
You can find and delete your pending requests from the "My Activity"
page:
https://www.bricklink.com/myActivity.asp
|
Done, thank you!
|
|
Author: | Turez | Posted: | May 27, 2024 10:49 | Subject: | Re: Made a mistake when submitting a request | Viewed: | 32 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog Requests, CanadaFirst writes:
| Title says it all, I made a mistake and sent a request for change in weight and
size for the wrong set.
I meant to add the info to set 6469-1 but sent it for 6461-1
How do I cancel my request for 6461-1?
|
You can find and delete your pending requests from the "My Activity"
page:
https://www.bricklink.com/myActivity.asp
|
Author: | CanadaFirst | Posted: | May 27, 2024 10:17 | Subject: | Made a mistake when submitting a request | Viewed: | 80 times | Topic: | Catalog | Status: | Open | |
| Title says it all, I made a mistake and sent a request for change in weight and
size for the wrong set.
I meant to add the info to set 6469-1 but sent it for 6461-1
How do I cancel my request for 6461-1?
|
Author: | TakeAbricK | Posted: | May 26, 2024 10:42 | Subject: | Re: Cardboard Sleeves | Viewed: | 45 times | Topic: | Catalog | |
| In Catalog, randyipp writes:
| In Catalog, TakeAbricK writes:
| - The two sleeves on the left can still be added to the catalog, but not the
two on the right.
|
Assuming you mean the bottom two since when you post it lays out different than
the preview for creating the post (just for clarification).
|
Yes, thank you for your clarification.
Diana
|
Next Page: 5 More | 10 More | 25 More | 50 More | 100 More
|