| Discussion Forum: Thread 350561 |
|
 |
| | | Author: | Gaston.La.Brick  | | Posted: | Nov 22, 2023 14:55 | | Subject: | Change blservice@bricklink.com to noreply@... | | Viewed: | 119 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | | Status: | Open | | Vote: | [Yes|No] | |
|
| Sometimes - it's not always clear when - replying to an email from a BrickLink
user, has the email address blservice@bricklink.com in the addressee's field.
Sometimes the actual user's email address.
It's confusing, but until a thorough solution for messaging is implemented,
I would like the "blservice" is changed to "noreply" so it's
at lease a more visual give-away the email will not reach the user.
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | Nov 22, 2023 15:19 | | Subject: | Re: Change blservice@bricklink.com to noreply@... | | Viewed: | 43 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Gaston.La.Brick writes:
| | Sometimes - it's not always clear when - replying to an email from a BrickLink
user, has the email address blservice@bricklink.com in the addressee's field.
Sometimes the actual user's email address.
It's confusing, but until a thorough solution for messaging is implemented,
I would like the "blservice" is changed to "noreply" so it's
at lease a more visual give-away the email will not reach the user.
|
Much more, some webmails or clients tell you you're probably doing wrong
when trying to send to a noreply@ address, ex. there's a message box displayed
in Thunderbird.
|
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Nov 22, 2023 15:59 | | Subject: | Re: Change blservice@bricklink.com to noreply@... | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, Gaston.La.Brick writes:
| | Sometimes - it's not always clear when - replying to an email from a BrickLink
user, has the email address blservice@bricklink.com in the addressee's field.
Sometimes the actual user's email address.
It's confusing, but until a thorough solution for messaging is implemented,
I would like the "blservice" is changed to "noreply" so it's
at lease a more visual give-away the email will not reach the user.
|
Agreed! However, I would go further and change it to NO-REPLY@bricklink.com because
this is one time where it's good to shout.
~Jen
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | Nov 22, 2023 16:00 | | Subject: | Re: Change blservice@bricklink.com to noreply@... | | Viewed: | 28 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, jennnifer writes:
| | In Suggestions, Gaston.La.Brick writes:
| | Sometimes - it's not always clear when - replying to an email from a BrickLink
user, has the email address blservice@bricklink.com in the addressee's field.
Sometimes the actual user's email address.
It's confusing, but until a thorough solution for messaging is implemented,
I would like the "blservice" is changed to "noreply" so it's
at lease a more visual give-away the email will not reach the user.
|
Agreed! However, I would go further and change it to NO-REPLY@bricklink.com because
this is one time where it's good to shout.
|
No no - noreply@ is a common filter for some apps (like Thunderbird) I'm
not sure no-reply (lower or upper) would be detected the same 
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Nov 22, 2023 16:10 | | Subject: | Re: Change blservice@bricklink.com to noreply@... | | Viewed: | 33 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| | […]
No no - noreply@ is a common filter for some apps (like Thunderbird) I'm
not sure no-reply (lower or upper) would be detected the same
|
The filters should work with uppercase because e-mail addresses are case insensitive.
BL already uses noreply@… for invoices. It would be weird to use both noreply
and no-reply.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Author: | SylvainLS | | Posted: | Nov 22, 2023 16:24 | | Subject: | Re: Change blservice@bricklink.com to noreply@... | | Viewed: | 24 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, SylvainLS writes:
| | In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| | […]
No no - noreply@ is a common filter for some apps (like Thunderbird) I'm
not sure no-reply (lower or upper) would be detected the same
|
The filters should work with uppercase because e-mail addresses are case insensitive.
BL already uses noreply@… for invoices. It would be weird to use both noreply
and no-reply.
|
Just looked in my e-mails:
— some use noreply, others no-reply,
— my bank is using both noreply and no-reply,
— LEGO uses order-acknowledged, Noreply, and no-reply-billing03 (I guess the
number may vary).
Anyway, BL can also simply use
"NO REPLY" {noreply@bricklink.com}
or
"BrickLink NO REPLY" {noreply@bricklink.com}
(with chevrons instead of curly brackets).
That is, use the format that allows a “displayed name” added in front of the
e-mail address (which is then enclosed in chevrons).
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Author: | jennnifer | | Posted: | Nov 22, 2023 16:26 | | Subject: | Re: Change blservice@bricklink.com to noreply@... | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, jennnifer writes:
| | In Suggestions, Gaston.La.Brick writes:
| | Sometimes - it's not always clear when - replying to an email from a BrickLink
user, has the email address blservice@bricklink.com in the addressee's field.
Sometimes the actual user's email address.
It's confusing, but until a thorough solution for messaging is implemented,
I would like the "blservice" is changed to "noreply" so it's
at lease a more visual give-away the email will not reach the user.
|
Agreed! However, I would go further and change it to NO-REPLY@bricklink.com because
this is one time where it's good to shout.
|
No no - noreply@ is a common filter for some apps (like Thunderbird) I'm
not sure no-reply (lower or upper) would be detected the same
|
Well, this is far beyond my knowledge base.  How about: THIS-EMAIL-IS-GOING-NOWHERE@...
? That might get people's attention!
~Jen
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | Nov 22, 2023 16:31 | | Subject: | Re: Change blservice@bricklink.com to noreply@... | | Viewed: | 29 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| | | | | No no - noreply@ is a common filter for some apps (like Thunderbird) I'm
not sure no-reply (lower or upper) would be detected the same
|
Well, this is far beyond my knowledge base. How about: THIS-EMAIL-IS-GOING-NOWHERE@...
? That might get people's attention!
|
Why not instead, put the e-mail address of the message sender as the "Reply-To"
field?
Then, it's another problem, as some webmails/clients don't accept to
reply to the reply-to address - like Thunderbird, I participated to a ticket
about this 
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | peregrinator | | Posted: | Nov 22, 2023 16:40 | | Subject: | Re: Change blservice@bricklink.com to noreply@... | | Viewed: | 26 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| | Why not instead, put the e-mail address of the message sender as the "Reply-To"
field?
|
Pretty sure it is
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | 1001bricks | | Posted: | Nov 22, 2023 16:52 | | Subject: | Re: Change blservice@bricklink.com to noreply@... | | Viewed: | 21 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, peregrinator writes:
| | In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| | Why not instead, put the e-mail address of the message sender as the "Reply-To"
field?
|
Pretty sure it is
|
Not for all, like this one received a moment ago:
Return-Path: blservice@bricklink.com
Delivered-To: bricklink@1001bricks.com
No Reply-To.
|
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Author: | peregrinator | | Posted: | Nov 22, 2023 16:57 | | Subject: | Re: Change blservice@bricklink.com to noreply@... | | Viewed: | 41 times | | Topic: | Suggestions | |
|
| In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| | In Suggestions, peregrinator writes:
| | In Suggestions, 1001bricks writes:
| | Why not instead, put the e-mail address of the message sender as the "Reply-To"
field?
|
Pretty sure it is
|
Not for all, like this one received a moment ago:
Return-Path: blservice@bricklink.com
Delivered-To: bricklink@1001bricks.com
No Reply-To.
|
Maybe it doesn't happen when it's a message regarding an order? Although
I'm seeing it even there. But my messages are older.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belgium
France, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur
USA, Illinois
