Looking at the images in the article, the bottom side is different so the parts
can be distinguished easily.
Because the part was recently introduced, it should be easy to correct the set
inventories, and hopefully there will not be many problems with store inventories
for recently parted out sets.
Looking at the images in the article, the bottom side is different so the parts
can be distinguished easily.
Because the part was recently introduced, it should be easy to correct the set
inventories, and hopefully there will not be many problems with store inventories
for recently parted out sets.
Looking at the images in the article, the bottom side is different so the parts
can be distinguished easily.
Because the part was recently introduced, it should be easy to correct the set
inventories, and hopefully there will not be many problems with store inventories
for recently parted out sets.
That is very thorough. It seems as if it is such a minor mould change that would
make no change in functionality but that investigation really shows how such
a small change can make a big difference.
Looking at the images in the article, the bottom side is different so the parts
can be distinguished easily.
Because the part was recently introduced, it should be easy to correct the set
inventories, and hopefully there will not be many problems with store inventories
for recently parted out sets.
Would using 1 of each alleviate the new problem with the new mold?
Netherlands, Zuid-Holland
USA, Illinois
United Kingdom, England
